Astroturf Activists
Posted in General Topics, Health Care, National Issues August 10th, 2009 by admin

This is an absolutely brilliant term for the outspoken and occasionally violent movement that’s begun to spring up in opposition to health care reform. It, of course, refers to ‘grassroots’ activists by making a conscious distinction between the organized tea parties, angry mobs at town hall meetings (astroturf organizing), and true grassroots movements.

Mainstream media has begun to pick up on the differences. I’ve seen both CNN and MSNBC make references to astroturf organizing and while I doubt FOX News would call it that, I have to admit to not knowing for sure, seeing as watching a minute of FOX News creates a growing desire in me to stick sharp, pointy objects in my eyes and ears.

As the stories begin to trickle out from the media, research is beginning to show those behind the growing angry astroturf movement: corporations, right-wing republicans and even FOX commentator Glenn Beck!

In a conversation that can be seen on The Nation website, Princeton professor Melissa Harris-Lacewell and Keith Olbermann rightly discuss the question of just whom these angry mobs are comprised. Certainly, some of them are truly scared, confused, and concerned about the changes being discussed and proposed for health care. Others, on the other hand, are simply mouth pieces for the far-right, corporate health and pharmaceutical interests.

Progressives, (real) grassroots supporters of health care reform, both within and outside the Democratic Party need to get organized and moving on this, not only to show a strong, sound, and reasoned counter-argument to the “death panel” type propaganda, but also to show Congress the far-right aren’t the only ones who can turn out numbers to rallies.

Democratic Representatives and Senators are scared to hold public meetings during the recess because they fear the rabid mobs that have been turning out. During a time when it is the most important for our Congresspeople to be out in the public answering questions and fighting misinformation, they’re too afraid to come out of their offices.

Here in Hawaii, not one member of our Congressional delegation will be holding town hall meetings relating to health care because of their fear of the mob.

What’s more, President Obama should be publicly chastising the right-wing Republicans in Congress, rather than responding to the mob by chastising the progressives in his own Party. Those on the left side of the Democratic Party might be less inclined to publicly attack the right in their own Party if the leader of their Party and President of the United States was more willing to publicly challenge the right side of the Republican Party.

All of this makes any frank and public conversation about a Single-Payer system of public health impossible, but it also makes discussion about any real, if not mediocre, reform difficult. If rabid mobs stifle frank conversations about such vital topics like health care reform, there may not be any hope for the successful passage of real and comprehensive reform.


« « « Leave a comment » » »

3 Comments

  1. Lynn Shivers says

    Good article, Josh!

    August 10th, 2009 | #

  2. TruthfulCitizen says

    Others, on the other hand, are simply mouth pieces for the far-right, corporate health and pharmaceutical interests.

    Evidence?

    All of this makes any frank and public conversation about a Single-Payer system of public health impossible

    At his town hall meeting today, Obama denied that he is or has promoted single payer, despite videotaped evidence. Also, the meeting was scripted and limited to supporters. How can an honest dialogue take place when the President of the United States is a liar who silences all dissent?

    Princeton professor Melissa Harris-Lacewell and Keith Olbermann rightly discuss the question of just whom these angry mobs are comprised.

    Tonight on Olbermann, Harris claimed that the opponents of Obama’s healthcare plan were “racist” because they opposed change — and that opposing change is racist because the opponents of the 1960s civil rights legislation opposed change. Under her argument, opposing any legislation would be racist because all legislation effects a “change” in the law. Do believe this sort of argument, which characterizes all one’s political opponents as racist without proof or logic, encourages civil public debate?

    August 11th, 2009 | #

  3. peoplesdialectic says

    @TruthfulCitizen

    “Evidence?”

    Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

    Regarding your point about Obama's most recent town hall session, I will agree that the room was filled with a seemingly disproportionate number of grinning supporters and that's a shame and does everyone a disservice. As for his support for a Single-Payer system, I'm not sure what 'videotaped evidence' you're referring to, but the only times the President has mentioned Single-Payer is to say that his plan isn't a Single-Payer system. If you've video to the contrary, I'd like to see it.

    Did you watch the whole broadcast? She's not the only one who's calling some of these protesters racist. people attending these events are apparently fearful of the anger being displayed by some of those in attendance. The paining of a swastika on the sign in front of Congressman David Scott's office is a pretty good sign that racism is involved at some level.

    What's more, both Olbermann and Harris-Lacewell are careful to be clear that not everyone who is opposed to the President's plan is racist, nor is race a motivating factor for some, if not most, of the people attending town hall meetings. Try listening to the whole clip.

    Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

    August 11th, 2009 | #


RSS feed for these comments. | TrackBack URI

please sign my guest book